By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Squilliam said:
Jordahn said:
Microsoft could have easily said:

"Sony's Killzone 2 is an impressive graphical title, but our Gears of War 2 still sets the bar for graphical acheivement."

This would have been respectable because Gears of War 2 is still a graphically impressive looking game, and it appease the 360 fanboys. But Microsoft didn't take this route maybe because it's undeniable to them as well so the 360 fanboys here are scraping for excuses (the real trolls in this thread). Fact of the matter, Killzone 2 looks impressive no matter how you deny it.

You're the one calling fanboy.

Thread premise: Microsoft says...

People respond: Yes

Do we have to add Killzone denial to our dictionary? And still even then I don't see the denial. Hell, I don't see the fanboyishness either.

 

 

Sorry that when something resonably positive for SONY and negative for Microsoft is discussed it's hard to swallow.  And I too think that the 360 is capable to setting graphics better that K2, but that goes for both the 360 and PS3.  It's just that since even Microsoft admits that Killzone 2 looks terrific, the 360 fanboy (and I NEVER referred to the legit gamers who favor the 360) had to attempt to derail the positive graphical Killzone 2 comment by shfting focusing to 360 profitability, multi-player, and the claim that Microsoft is more looking out for the "true gamer."  As much as 360 fanboys like to claim that Microsoft is a class act over SONY (and they can be), they need to take a page from that logic by treating Microsoft's comment on regards to Killzone 2 equally while not trying to derail it because it is positive.

:)



Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.