phil on 14 September 2007
| CrashMan said: a few comments, @Yoj: The issue is that sony is using the '10 year startegy' to justify a lack of high quality games at the current time (almost a year in to its life) as developers are 'not yet familiar with it's features and capabilities,) which adds to the uncertainty of the viability of Sony's plan. Also, I am not saying more powerful technology necesarily will result in better games. I just think the PS3 is particularly succeptable to this kind of concern as it is billed for its technical prowess |
I don't think the "10 year strategy" is being used as a defense right now because of a lack of games. Sony went on record way back in 2005 stating that they planned a 10 year lifetime for the PS3.
