My XBox 360 vs PS3 comparison (mostly technical)

[phil]

elnino334 said:

phil said:

elnino334 said:

phil said:

elnino334:

This was supposed to be a comparison of the *technical* merits of the two systems, not their sales numbers.

I was referring to the "technical" merits. His title did say "mostly technical" and he gave all this info to basically show that the ps3 will be just fine etc. From what I read which was pretty long his making out the ps3 to be way ahead of the 360. Someone posted an article about the "technical" merits of the 360 which blew away the ps3 because the gpu is way ahead of it yet this guy says is about the same or yet the rsx is better. Bottomline is this comparison is baised and that is what I was pointing out.

If you disagree with that analysis, perhaps you'd care to point out why. What errors are made in his technical analysis?

Sorry not going to bother with this as in the end it doesn't matter. I think the article is very baised but that is just me. I prefer to comment on more concrete stuff but foolishly posted here after I finished reading but after thinking about it I felt it should be obvious to people.

 I'm not going to argue that the OP doesn't have a pro-PS3 bias.  But you see, that's the wonderful thing about technical analyses.  It doesn't matter what the bias of the person is... if their analysis can be shown to be wrong, then it's very clearly wrong.  If you can't pinpoint a problem with the analysis, then the analysis is correct, except for the possibility of a few logical fallacies, such as fact picking.  In the end, bias can easily be weeded out.

 What could be more concrete than that?  Sales numbers and opinions?