pearljammer said:
Kasz216 said:
Darc Requiem said:
pearljammer said:
I'd say the SNES slightly edges out the PS1. Both were amazing RPG consoles.
With Final Fantasy Tactics included, I'm not sure I'd prefer one list over the other. |
FFT was great but to borrowed just about everything for Tactics Ogre. Tactics Ogre was a better game too IMO.
|
I agree. Funny thing is i'm pretty sure Matsuno does too. FFT was once desribed by him as "dumbed down" for a wider audience when it came to the story.
Which FFT was still pretty complicated politics wise.
But then again it doesn't give you as many philosophical questions as TO does and doesn't force you to deal with as serious issues.
The bad guys and what is right and wrong is more black and white.
The only complaints i really here about TO are
1. It's too hard.
2. Vice.
To which I say two things
1. It's too hard. It is very challenging at times.
If you feel it's too hard train. Hell you don't even have to do it yourself you can set up two teams set it on auto and go do something else while you level up.
2. Vice his choice being based on the main characters choice sounds off until you realize his motivation is to put himself to where he can't be abused, and he feels that will be impossible if always shadowed by the main character.
|
You've both gotten me wanting to play Tactics Ogre. I haven't played any from the series before, which should I start at? Does it matter? Or is the story sequential?
|
there is a tactics ogre game for the GBA if you have one, its a lot less rare than the ps1 game
