Munkeh111 said:
Garnett said:
Munkeh111 said: Oh dear god, if you go for the head, it takes like 1 or 2 bullets to kill them. This is heaven compared to Gears of War where the shotgun was the only useful weapon. If they are far away, obviously you are going to have to empty most of your clip into them, but you obviously hold the trigger until they drop down dead it is simple.
I am loving the multiplayer, I think it is certainly the best that I have played since CoD 4 |
Actually the guns are not accurate enough to get a head shot,i always aim for it and single shot but i always miss.
Garnett said:
CGI-Quality said: @ Garnett
So now you're saying one of the greatest shooters this gen (Gears 2) sucks as aswell? Wow...how did Gears 2 controls suck? |
Greatest shooters this gen my ass,it has the same hype as KZ2 but worse gameplay..
75% of the ammo clip to kill someone just to get chainsawed behind your back,online is garbage and SP is boring.
|
Well then you are just rubbish. I would not really call myself great at FPSs, but I am doing very well at Killzone 2 because I get headshots. If you just use the standard ISA rifle, then you should be able to hit by using burst fire from a distance, up close just hold the trigger and hope
At least you agree with me about Gears of War 2, that MP was pretty shocking, certainly to begin with, and then it just feels balanced wrong, though I did enjoy the SP
|
I do that,problem is the gun isnt accurate even on single burst,and when i do it it takes about 4 more shots to drop them,or 6 more burst,and by then they are gone.
At least we agree on something :)