By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
madkiller said:
TruckOSaurus said:
nightsurge said:
TruckOSaurus said:

Like you said what is sexually offensive is different for everyone so it's up to the companies who run those services to define "sexually offensive" and there's no way those companies can get away with defining lesbian as sexually offensive.

 

Um... yeah they can.  It's 100% legal, too.

 

I'm not talking legally. The amount of bad PR that equating lesbian to sexually offensive would generate would be very damaging to any of those service.

No it wouldn't at all. The majority of the population may accept people being gay, but they still do not accept them in every single way. Just look at gay marriage, most people are still against it and probably always will be. Plus, it has already been proven that it had nothing to do with lesbian, it had to do with violating the TOS, where even saying you are hetero had the same effect.

 

Wait there, we're getting off track. My argument was that the other services couldn't reasonably ban someone for stating their sexual orientation because of how their ToS are worded compared to Microsoft's.

 



Signature goes here!