Soriku said:
Rpruett said:
Soriku said:
I think Rpruett is having "my opinion is right and yours is wrong" syndrome.
Not that I necessarily agree with Khuutra, though. But you're doing what many others have done. |
Not in the slightest. I'm just looking for a shred of evidence to prove his point. I've offered up my evidence (Which I believe is clearly obvious). He has yet to offer anything up.
Again, opinions are certainly funny like that. (You technically can't be wrong if you enclose yourself in a bubble and keep telling yourself something). Although, in the civilized world (Where we can come to a consensus) a vast majority of people and sources would come to the conclusion (And very easily) that PS2 obviously had a better, quality-filled, more robust software lineup than the Wii has (Even through their first 27 months).
I could sit here and say that Goldeneye 64 has better graphics than Crysis. Ofcourse, that is my opinion and I'm not wrong though...Right? There is the difference between forming logical, reasonable opinions and just holding an opinion because of a stubborn loyalty to something.
|
That doesn't make sense.
Crysis having better graphics than Goldeneye isn't an opinion, it's a fact. Go tell me how many people can actually deny that. On the other hand ome people DO think the Wii has a better library of games than the PS2 and also vice versa. That's opinion.
|
It's certainly not fact. Or is there some quantifiable measure of graphics? Obviously, most objective, rational people would agree that Crysis in fact has better graphics than Goldeneye.
They both are opinions and both are completely stupid ones.
