TheRealMafoo said:
I agree people were stupid for buying something they could not afford, but the banks were being incentivized by government for giving the loans. If banks gave a certain percentage of subprime loans, then they got a better deal on all their loans. It was Congresses way of putting poor people into homes. |
When looking up the name of the Community Reinvestment Act that caused this shift that caused the housing bust, I couldn't help but watch some of the horrendous accusations made by Democrats in congress that the auditors were wrong.
My community has been a 'victim' of the housing bubble. We're on the edge of a major city (Columbus, Ohio). Wonce the CRA went into effect, real estate prices went on a sharp increase for the past 7-8 years, and many people overspent on their houses. Once the bubble burst, those that were trying to sell their houses got a rude awakening on the 'real' price of a home - now half of the city (around 13,000) is on the market, and the houses aren't selling, as buyers are weary of the seller's stupidity.
I agree that it wasn't entirely the banks fault(s) - their goal is to minimize risk, and maximize profits. When the government subsidized bad behavior, and stupid ideas, there's nothing holding them back from doing it. Still, you wish that someone would have shown restraint, which is why I say everyone is to blame - but the Govt. first, people second, businesses third.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.







