The fundamental flaw in this article is the assumption that gamers owe Sega for some reason. They really don't. It isn't the customer's fault that s/he isn't interested in the bait Sega is dangling before them.
I think the author is actually trying to say, "You failed me by not buying the Sega games I wanted you to buy." Why does he think other people have a duty to support his cause?
There are many kinds of games I would like to see made, and genres I'd like to see revived, but I know that I'm only one consumer, and I can only vote with my own voice and my own wallet. Chastising other people for not wanting what I want isn't going to make my dreams come true.
"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.
