Squilliam said:
darendt said:
NJ5 said:
darendt said:
NJ5 said:
So not only is it not 60 fps, but it's not even a stable 30 fps? If this is what passes for a technically good game these days, fine...
It's quite annoying that most of the 360 games I played have noticeable framerate dips whereas the Wii is much better in this regard.
|
LOL, really, you are comparinng the Wii to the 360 and PS3 in terms of framerate? Put any Wii game on either 360 or PS3 and they wouldnt even break a sweat at 60FPS hell 120FPS
|
If it's fine to say PS360 games have better graphics, why is it not fine to say Wii games have better framerates?
There's this thing called reality in which your post is meaningless.
|
My point was that there is no excuss to not have solid framerates on the Wii due its low speced games. The worst looking PS3/360 games look leaps and bounds better than any Wii game. Not saying they are all better games mind you, just look better.
|
Well the Xbox 360 and PS3 games hardly hardly have an excuse considering the sheer performance advantages the consoles have over the Wii, and yet the Wii games seem to net more stable frame-rates.
|
WOW, so that point just zipped right over your head didnt it. Put the most hardware intensive game for the Wii on the 360 or PS3 and they could pull it off without a hitch. You couldnt even boot the load screen for KZ2 on the Wii. The games that have been made for the Wii to date, are not games designed to push the hardware. They are some pretty basic games from what i have seen.
