MaxwellGT2000 said:
windbane said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
windbane said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
windbane said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
windbane said:
at least he amused himself, even if he missed my real point. |
That someone that 1) hasn't played an unreleased game is saying the slowdown doesn't effect gameplay and 2) just shown he doesn't know much about game graphics, yet has been whining about Wii graphics for over a year but praising PS3 graphics on internet forums... yeah...
So the point I've been getting from the overall posts you've made.
Graphics matter when it comes to Wii, if it's something like Metroid Prime 3, and can't tell the difference between it and the past games, and will refute all the given facts, yet if Killzone 2 has framerate that dips into the 20s and could possibly effect gameplay, all of a sudden technical stuff doesn't matter...
Just me but when you go around telling people things it just doesn't seem from a reliable source, I say wait till the game comes out and actually play it to make judgement, because the beta and the demo's are not the full game.
|
1. I played the game for several hundred hours.
2. The triangle thing was a joke. I'm sorry you didn't understand that.
3. Graphics matter when it comes to Wii but no one freaking cares to study the technical aspects of their games because they aren't held up to be technically impressive.
4. There are nearly 60 reviews counted on metacritic and none of them mention frame rate problems being an issue in the game, which is why I don't take this thread seriously. The fact that people need to attack this game is retarded to me. It's a great game.
|
So you were trolling?
|
This entire thread is trolling, including you. I merely included a joke with my points. You must be hurt that you didn't understand I was kidding.
You also (again) ignored my points.
In addition to the hundreds of beta hours (where performance actually matters), the demo has no problems. The reviews say there are no problems. The only people saying there are problems are you guys that haven't played the game.
|
Entire thread.... trolling... you just said that... wow... a thread about a study on the framerate is not trolling no matter how you look at it, I'm sorry if you're butthurt by a few facts and studies and a discussion.
Beta doesn't mean anything if the final game doesn't have stability.
|
In addition to the hundreds of beta hours (where performance actually matters), the demo has no problems. The reviews say there are no problems. The only people saying there are problems are you guys that haven't played the game.
|
People like Squilliam have played the beta, I've played the demo, we know how it plays. And like it or not the demo did have some slowdown when a lot of gernades and explosions were going off, nothing game breaking, but could end up being worse in some parts, as developers usually want to demo/beta the best looking and most stable parts of the game.
If I wanted to get into issues that everyone knows about and GG even confirmed was the input lag, there's even a thread on the official sony forums by them that said they are aware of the issue but the final game doesn't have it, while people that have gotten the game early by some shops breaking streetdate, they say the issue is still there in the final game.
|
Squilliam's gameplay experience, if he did indeed have it, doesn't seem to be a factor here. He's constantly putting down the PS3 so where are his remarks about the framerate leading to his death in the beta? as for the demo, no one but you is noticing that slowdown. I've played the demo probably 50 times now, and I'm not exagerrating. I have noticed no slowdown.
Again, why do reviews not care? It's a non-issue.
btw, are you buying this game? I've love to kill you in it.
