By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
nojustno said:
TheInfectedBy590 said:
Why so much shock? Halo was an alright FPS, what made it stand out was that it was made specifically for consoles. Now making an RTS and just slapping the 'Halo' name on it, doesn't mean it's gonna be good. I saw this coming a mile away.

 

sorry to burst your bubble, but it is actually good

 

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/halowars?q=halo%20wars

^^

proves how shit gamespot can be at times

Most of the reviews for the game are around 80. Therefore, Gamespot's 65 is just as far away from the average review as the 95 from Vandal Online. Somehow, I doubt you'll complain about their 95 though. Personally, I feel the same way as the person who reviewed the game for Gamespot, although I think it's more of a 7.5. Still, it's overly simplistic and because of this I found it boring and couldn't even finish the demo. Furthermore, while it has good controls for a console RTS it still can't touch a PC RTS and why should we be rewarding that? Sure its ok for console but loses out to almost every RTS on console. Personally, I think this game is for fans of the Halo universe and maybe someone who hasn't played an RTS on PC and wants to try out the genre on consoles. Most other people I don't see thinking it's too great.

 




PS3 Trophies