I'm not saying that RPGfan, RPGamer, RPGland and some more gave all those 360 RPG's bad scores, in fact some them did give them even some real good scores, but Bitmap said:
Specialized sites on j-rpgs have a way higher chance of being platform-biased since many are smallest sites run by fans that have associated jrpg with the playstation logo for the past decade.
And with this he suggested that those small sites are biased towards the Xbox 360, hell, I believe that some of there reviewers did put Fable II in there best of 2008 lists.
By the way, if the RPG's that have a 77-79 deserve a 85-89%, what do the RPG's deserve that have an avarage of 85-87%?







