By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Khuutra said:
twesterm said:
  1. I never trust people when they say A study says... since it's pretty easy to make a study say whatever you want.
  2. I trust the study even less when you provide no source.
  3. You can't really compare two totally different games.
  4. Since you're on a TV, again, it doesn't matter if you're running at 60FPS because TV's cannot do 60FPS
  5. Processing 30FPS is hard enough but the higher FPS you go, the more strain it puts on the machine.  Some people can notice a difference but not nearly everybody and not nearly enough to justify the processing power it takes.  That power is much more wisely spent on other things.

Forgive my ignorance, but doesn't every television that can do progressive scan display in 60FPS? That is, every EDTV and HDTV on the market?

on stadard def 60 for ntsc, 50 for pal  and i dont know secam. Interlaced does 30 every other frames, Progresive is 60.

 



dd if = /dev/brain | tail -f | grep games | nc -lnvvp 80

Hey Listen!

https://archive.org/details/kohina_radio_music_collection