That Guy said:
so not sending troops to Afganistan = failing campaign promise and not caring about national defense OR sending troops to Afganistan = increasing number of troops overseas
No matter what he does you have a cause for complaint.
A crafty one you are ^_^ |
So if Bush had done this 6 months ago, Akuma would be praising him for it? I think not.
I have no problems with the troops being send there, but Obama's campaign promise was to reduce the troops in Iraq, and send them to Afghanistan. He has shown no signs of reducing troops in Iraq.
Also, as far as campaign promises. He said he wants to give congress 5 days on every bill, so they could properly read it. The biggest spending package in US history come up, and people are given 12 hours.
Trillion of dollars are pouring out of government, and they are broke. Trillions more are going to. How come I am the only one who sees this as a bad thing?
Oh, and just for fun, here is a good way to visualize a trillion dollars. If you took a trillion 1 dollar bills, and stacked them up. The would reach a third of the way to the moon. Before it's over, Obama will give away (yes, just give away) enough to reach the moon.
The government doesn't make money. The only way the can give money, is to take it from someone. If Obama really wanted to simulate the economy, he would not have to give me $20,000. Just stop taking it away from me to give $20,000 to someone else.
I have my own mortgage to pay. Looks like I am going to have other peoples to pay as well.
