| disolitude said: I don't see any bias in this guys questions. He is writing an article about PS3...why would he be asking about the 360? David Jaffe is being asked about PS3 falures and successes and is basically saying... "Look over there, the rabbit has a fluffy tail" |
They seem pretty biased to me :
It seems the PS3 has been cobbled together since its release: feature-cutting to help cut costs, patched with controller rumble, patched with Home, patched with trophy achievements -- like the console never had a specific plan.
Home was known to be coming out for quite awhile. Sony stated from the beginning that the PSN was an evolving service. (Adding things doesn't fit in with 'cobbling' features together.
It seems that releasing a feature-rich console for $600, now $400, was a crippling move for Sony, especially given the recent economic downturn. Would you agree? Why/why not?
Why was this move 'Crippling' to Sony? They are on the verge of making profit and sales are very solid for the system. Especially with that high price point.
Consumers appear indifferent to Blu-ray technology. Do you feel Sony overvalued Blu-ray, after DVD helped the PS2 become such a huge success?
Why have Consumers appeared indifferent to Blu-Ray technology? Blu-Ray has actually been adopted rather well thus far. It doesn't have tons of market share currently but the adoption rate is certainly solid.
