choirsoftheeye said:
mitsuhide said:
I was talking just about technoligies actually in the machines. Each company pushes the industry in different ways:Nintendo:They made Motion Control as standed. Sony:They pushed graphics this gen. MS:Brought online play on to consoles as a standed last gen and it took effect this gen. |
Eh. You said that Sony made much larger leaps this gen then Nintendo or MS. Even if we're just talking technological horsepower here, I'm not convinced the PS3 is significantly more powerful than the 360 in terms of its actual rather than theoretical capabilities. And before anyone cites Killzone 2, I really don't get the graphical hype about that title. Maybe it's just because I think the art direction (which is different than the technical strength of the graphics) is boring as toast after my eyes have seen the stylized worlds of BioShock and to a lesser degree Metroid Prime 3.
 |
Funny thing I was telling my cousin that timeshift looks as good as killzone 2 as to me they seem to share similar art style. Compare the two especially if you played the demo you can see there honestly isn't much difference in terms of the stuff going on. Unless I get to play a demo for killzone 2 I just don't see based on HD videos online how it is leaps ahead of games already out or coming out etc.
