By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RPG said:
selnor said:
LOL at the Selnor worriers. Any JRPG fan doesnt use reviews from normal sites.

Specialist sites like RPGfan are the sites I'll be listening to. Would you like to know why?

FF12 was a 6 at best for me. What do you think Game Informer gave it....

http://www.gameinformer.com/Games/Review/200612/R06.1027.1216.33677.htm

 

Are you calling JRPG fans retarded? The "real" gaming sites are the only ones I trust for JRPG reviews, Famitsu live by moneyhats and hype but Dengeki are very good.

I use normal sites fine for pretty much every other genre. But JRPG's are a taste which many reviewers in the mainstream dont have. I wouldnt use for instance IGN or Gamespot for JRPG reviews if someone paid me.

But specialist sites like RPGgamer and RPGfan are reviewed by people who live and breath RPG's. RPG's need to be reviewed by people who obsess with them. They arent scared to say which FF games for instance are plain crap. The mainstream are bombarded with FF this and FF that. Honestly there is so much more to RPG gaming than FF.

IMO after 12 attempts it goes like this.

FF6 = 10/10

FF7  FF2  FF9 = 9/10

FF8 = 8/10

FF1  FF3  FF10 = 7/10

FF4  FF12 = 6/10

FF 5 = 4/10

FF11 = 3/10.