| non-gravity said: axed or extended and built upon |
What do you mean? Are you talking about if they didn't kill Dent off? I can get on board with that, but that is why we have sequels. Frankly, Dent should have gotten his own film to shine and not shoehorned into the same flick as the Joker. I don't think that means give us a 4 1/2 hour movie to tell two completely different stories. I think that means they pick their plots and points of seperation better. The movie did feel a bit like the Oscars. It started off good, got really longwinded in the middle and had a forced, and packed ending seemingly because of time constraints.
If you didn't mean that, and just meant they should have picked up where the movie left off with Batman on the run, that's what the third one will be about, so I don't see the point of just making that as one movie. It wouldn't serve a purpose.
Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.
