|
forevercloud3000 said: Speak to nintendo in the N64 and Gamecube era |
Not necessarily. The article itself states that Sony isn't just going to hand it to anyone. Sure that means that the quality of titles should be greater for games using that engine (unless Sony do it by name only and we get the first crappy game from Bethesda etc), but it doesn't mean there'll be a "slew of new exclusives".
On top of that, I doubt the Killzone engine would be made available without substantial cost (something developers need to factor in, which is why most of the big name ones make their own). Then the PS3 fanboys have to factor in that no other game will look as good as Killzone 2 on that engine, so you'll most likely get a below Gears 1 game with it graphics wise (not saying the engine sucks, but there's no way anyone else could push that engine as much as guerilla who made it has).
Do you really want that?
Let's not forget that the Killzone 2 engine excels in motion, special effects and lighting, how would that translate in any other genre? (I doubt a slower, stealth game would look as good, because KZ2 looks great when it's brutal, and it's brutal when the player is sprinting full throttle).
So anyway, will this new engine create more PS3 exclusives? Sure, it's not unreasonable to assume that. What's unreasonable, is to say that this new engine will be used by every new developer and that it'll mean alot more exclusives for the PS3 (when in reality it'll be 3 or 4 max over 5 years). You've also got to look at how the engine would handle a slower pace game as opposed to an FPS.







