Kasz216 on 16 February 2009
| forevercloud3000 said: @Kasz My definition is much more descriptive. An imaginary or fictional character is just that, a CHARACTER that is imaginary. That does not mean the core definition of a character does not apply. As a result, Warrior or whoever is not a character because he is devoid of personality or distinctive traits(besides his class). |
It's more descriptive.... yet not correct.
Plenty of characters in literary history are only known by what they've done and not by their personalities... at all.
Is it your claim that Beowulf is not a character?
Beowulf is also only known by his deeds with no mention of personality.
