| emilie autumn said: chavez has being the only president in venezuela to see the poor have atleast a little bit to eat, some desicions he has taken have indeed being outratgeous, but the point is that without a lot of people would have died of hunger. i actually hate capitalism and think that all of america if not the world should be socialist. |
I won't deny what you say because it is true for the most part, but Chavez is not the answer! People see in him as the savior because he gives them crumbles, something that even previous governments didn't do. But what Chavez has basically done is make the people dependant of the government, they aren't taught to fish, they are given the fishes and that's not the way a nation makes its progress. Giving crumbles to the population is easy when you have a high price oil barrel, now it is at 40$ which very low compared to last year and Chavez will see himself in a lot of trouble to please the people but at least he's able to stay in power as much as he wants if he takes control of the electoral branch.
I'm against Chavez but I'm a democratic person and if people elected him fine, and if you support him I respect that, but unlimited reelections are against the principles of democracy and are a very good way to start a dictatorship.
I would like poeple that if Chavez did something good to them it doesn't mean that anyone else can't do good things too.
I envy the governments of the north of Europe like Iceland, Norway, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium, Luxembourg... Those countreis have a great governments that educate their people and give them dignity, their population are peaceful and they are very progressive...
