dhummel said:
haxxiy said:
Cypher1980 said:
axumblade said:
Cypher1980 said:
Having just read the review in Edge I serously doubt it will be that influential.
The summing up went something like this.
KZ2 is memorable due to its Craft and Imagination.
Mainly because the first is sublime and the second non existent.
7/10 |
You are basing it off of the lowest review? Not saying you didn't get anything out of it but at the same time, it's not necessarily what all the sites that gave it a 9/10 think about Killzone 2.
|
Well Yes and No. I tend to trust Edge as 99 percent of the time they reflect my opinion as a gamer.
They are tough markers and the thing they seem to hate most is games that just regurgitate what has been produced before. That is IMHO why they only gave KZ2 a 7/10.
Other comments where that the games story stinks. In the Single Player mode its move from one generic firefight to a check point then rinse and repeat.
It may be a graphical powerhouse but I doubt many people will want to rush out and buy a Halo meets Resistance hybrid.
|
No need to say something more, man. That was enough to everybody here understand your condition.
|
Nice move. Avoiding someone's specific points and typecasting them from their second sentence is always an easy way to disregard their actual argument. Furthermore, doing so in incoherent English (see your second sentence) just puts icing on the cake. Normally I don't point out grammar mistakes, but I think you deserve it this time.
|
Nevermind the sentence. You have got more important issues to be worried about. You said you trust Edge as reviewers, and your only excuse to it must be the lack of intelligence.
