Ok
1. Anybody saying that evolution is not blatantly true with an abundance of evidence to back it up, go read "why evolution is true" by Jerry Coyne. The only reason evolution is not accepted in the way relativity or gravity are is because religious minded people fear it for no good reason. The evidence in it's favor is vast and overwhelming and it IS considered a fact by the scientific community and for good reason. It is not a possibility, it is reality. End of statement.
2. @slimebeast I don't believe solidly in a multiverse, I regard it merely as a possibility. Ignorance doesn't equal faith. (though this guy seems to think so) What happened to start the big bang? Not sure yet, but that doesn't mean a unicorn did it. It's not "god" I have a problem with. That is an unprovable position one way or another. It's the god of any religion that is clearly a relic of ancient civilizations and tribes. And if you take those gods out of the equation, if you think yahweh is a brutal dictator that lead a tribe that acts much like the vicious theocracies of today, That Jesus was the result of that brutal tribe no longer having military might preventing them from being able to commit mass genocide and instead decide to give peace a chance, once you take Allah, the hindu gods, ect ect out of the picture, why would I believe in a space man instead of a natural mechanistic cause?
You say the problem is the beginning, and that guy doesn't come up with a solution to it. He just claims he does by using grossly flawed logic. He says that God didn't need a beginning because he existed before the big bang and thusly before time so there is no concept of beginning. But that argument can apply to a non space man cause just as easily. A point he conveniently never comes to.
And yes I am frustrated.
You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.
