Slimebeast said:
Are you mocking him just for the sake of it, or you really don't understand the essence of the problem? Meanwhile you are actually willing to believe (it seems you're even leaning towards that belief) in the crazy idea that there exists an infinite number of universes? I understand that people can buy this multiverse theory at a first glance, but people that really have given thought about it - if they still believe in such thing, I can't take them seriously. Also I know then what it comes down to, they don't want to believe in a God. No matter the spin, they will take anything else for an explanation.
|
The multiverse theory is physically sound. I'm not going to say whether I think it is correct or what bearing it has on the validity of evolution/ID, but know that many interpretations of Quantum Mechanics (and ALL of them are valid and equally justified) postulate either multiple universes with different physical constants, or many-worlds with wavefunction collapse creating perpendicular realities. None of this is weird, an there is far weider stuff in QM that is 100% certain, like time travel, entanglement, the uncertainty principle and the violation of Bell's inequality.
Actually, multiple universes are the best way to get around much worse problems. The main alternative to it is that the human mind is special and retroactively causes the universe to exist by collapsing the wavefunction backwards in time. And some well-respected physicists believe that.







