Killzone 2 will Be a Platform Moving Game Claims Sony

[Shadowblind]

Kantor said:

Shadowblind said:

Kantor said:

alfredofroylan said:

Kantor said:

Griffin said:
Why would anyone buy the PS3 for KZ2, edge got it right with its 7/10.

I'm sorry, have you played the full game? Stop whining about the aiming, honestly! Go play CoD4 if you need auto aim to shoot something.

Well many of us have played this game for years. The only difference is that it has pretty graphics now.

 

Then you should be used to it!

And how many FPS games have a cover system? I can only think of KZ2 and Rainbow Six Vegas, which sucked.

 

 Your kidding me.

Based on the demo, R6V cover system >>> Killzone 2 cover system. And they were different, as R6V goes into third person, while in Killzone 2, "in cover" means having half you body seemingly exposed.

I don't think anybodys gonna use it, as the game plays fine without it. Its almost just in there to be in there. theres a lot of other merits you can use for Killzone 2, the cover system isn't one of them.

No, no, the cover system didn't suck, the game on the whole sucked.

I don't think anybody can get through the game without using cover, personally. It's not a run and gun game. I know. I've tried. And that was the first eight minutes of a ten hour game.

@madskillz: I agree with what he says, just not why he says it. Killzone 2 won't move consoles because it does not have a large fanbase, and because it's not revolutionary.

 

 You have to use cover of course, but not the cover system. Played the same as CoD 4; you NEED cover. But not the cover system. Every time I went in cover I still kept getting shot in KZ2, it was much easier to just move in and out of cover without using the the system to simply peek around corners. Plus you can't zoom in cover, and the aiming is broken enough as it is.

Lol, I gotta disagree with your statement about R6V. Its up with gears on my "amazingly fun online game" list.