| Naraku_Diabolos said: Sony's logic is flawed. I don't own either a PS3 (obvious reasons; no B/C and I don't like nearly all the games on the console) or an X360 (don't like their games, but maybe the RPGs; and I don't want a flawed console that could die on me any second, regardless if they fixed it or not), but I believe that the Xbox Live would be of better valued. You only spend the $50 fee once for a year (if I'm correct), but it's put to good use for server maintenance and other things. On Sony's expense or for what they are saying, it's a total waste to buy stuff that you may enjoy at first but may end up regret your purchase(s) later in time. Sorry Sony, but you're starting to suck at what you're doing. Just make electronics and stop spewing propaganda about other corporations. It makes you look bad and makes your customers think twice about you as a whole. |
No, their logic isn't flawed. Most people think it's a better value to have more stuff on general principle. Humans are greedy. And they are absolutely right, you can get a hell of a lot more for your $50 on PSN because you'll get a bunch of things you may want and you still get to play online. For free. If anything, your logic is flawed, but I think we can just come to a middle ground and say some people will prefer Sony's proposition and some MS's, right? I mean, I can want to spend my money on games and you can want to throw it away on a service virtually everyone else in the world gives away for free. I'll buy food to sustain myself, while you can buy bottled air. To each their own.
You do not have the right to never be offended.
