I suppose you don't think the relationship between review scores and advertising is clear, either, yet many insiders have pointed it out on numerous occasions. When someone butters your bread, you do things the way they'd like it in return.
Also, anything about Sony, be it products or fans, is about Sony. The message here is "Sony fans get rabid about mediocre games, so don't listen to them when they try to sell you on the PS3." Maybe you should take a rhetoric class, should you ever be up to 300-level English courses.
Or a marketing class, since this is the basis on how viral marketing was built. You trust the article because it was written by a human being (as if ads aren't), and give credence that it MUST be their opinion or they wouldn't have done it. You can associate better because they put their name on the product rather than the company that paid for it to be made, yet the purpose is still clear: to discredit Sony's products via the conduct of Sony's fans. If they react like this to KZ2 having bad reviews, how can anyone trust Uncharted or Resistance to be good games? The point is to make people ask themselves that, and just because you don't know the business enough to see that doesn't mean it isn't the reality of the situation.
Also, I don't see you guessing what console I own, but you sure do seem to be guessing things about my personality that you are hardly capable of knowing. So where was I wrong in saying that?
You do not have the right to never be offended.
