By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kenkaku said:
"1. your a Sony or Nintendo fanboy

2. Your just stupid, ill rip into any game you like if you want me too, im sick of you pointing out every little mistake, and guess what most of that is crap you come up with."

I'm guessing you missed the part where I own a 360.

As for number 2, what will that prove? Will it somehow null all of my points? And if you really think that what I claimed is 'crap that I made up,' then I'm guessing you haven't played the series.

Also:

"Also the storyline is quite deep, but your brain probably cant handle it at this point"

Or I can't figure it out because they decided to put the key details into books instead of the actual games. Memory is probably failing me, but I can't think of any other games that used books as canon to fill up the series of plotholes.

"There is no need to read the books to "get" the games' story and you probably know that perfectly well."

You can't honestly be serious. The opening pits you in the middle of nowhere, giving no background detail about anything or anyone, and Halo 2 starts off... months, perhaps, after the ending of the first Halo. You'd have to be an executive to really understand the story regardless.

And I can't remember what other poster said it, but I didn't expect to be bumping an 'old topic;' it was featured on the front page of the site, so I decided to check in to see what's going on, and then found the response to my post.

Oh, one more thing:

"Your just stupid"

Quote for life.

Acually i have both games sitting right in front of me, cause if you have played the series, then of course the game is crap and has a storyline that only appears in books. Really now, if you actually paid attention in the game, you might see it has quite a story, and alot is to be figured out in halo 3.

You can persume anything about the start of halo 2, again if you have actually played the games, you would know he had just gotten back from the first halo. So because it doesnt have a exact timeline the story is off. It does not matter, no details were missed in the time it took him to get back, and frankly i dont think really anyone cares how long it was, except of course you.

Yes the books add details, why they added them, but the game itself has quite a storyline, again if you just follow it, it might make sense. While much deeper in the books (it should be), the story is still quite good in the games.

I add the your just stupid to be rather nice, instead of calling you what you really are for posting only on this

Keep ripping into one of the most popular games in history, everyone will surely like you on this site

Like final fan said, keep your halo shit out of here, and i say just go away

 



                 With regard to Call of Duty 4 having an ultra short single player campaign, I guess it may well have been due to the size limitations of DVD on the XBox 360, one of various limitations multi-platform game designers will have to take into consideration-Mike B   

Proud supporter of all 3 console companys

Proud owner of 360wii and DS/psp              

Game trailers-Halo 3 only dissapointed the people who wanted to be dissapointed.

Bet with Harvey Birdman that Lost Odyssey will sell more then Blue dragon did.