| mesoteto said: please dont dare knock the Ccondemned series in front of me and try to act like its an inferior game....it only proves to me that your a graphics whore that cant appricat anythign that isnt bleeding polygons
and yes the only thing about KZ that is better then Bloodshot is the graphics |
Condemned is a solid game but it isn't in the same class as Kill Zone 2. It just isn't. Condemned is a game you rent and have fun with. Kill Zone 2 is a game you purchase and have fun with. There is a difference. And a vast majority of people would agree with that statement.
I certainly value gameplay. I certainly don't care about only graphics. Kill Zone 2 has good gameplay for a First Person Shooter. Certainly every bit as good as Condemned 2 did.
You expect Kill Zone 2 to re-invent the wheel entirely for First Person Shooters and act like since it hasn't added all these different features it is somehow a poor game. Did Halo 1/ Halo 2/ Halo 3 drastically change the way shooters were done? Nope. Did Goldeneye 64 really change the way First Person Shooters were done? Nah.
This reminds of an argument of someone complaining about Gran Turismo and how they don't like the straight racing modes. Well ofcourse you won't like Gran Turismo, It's a RACING game.
