Who probably spent their $50 million better: Microsoft or Sony?

[ChichiriMuyo]

gebx said:

papflesje said:

gebx said:
Sony - $50 million
KZ2 campaign - 6 to 8 hours

MS - $50 million
L&D Campaign - 10 to 12 hours
Expension #2 - ??


As a gamer I would say MS!!!

 

Oh FFS.

Stop lying :-/

Every review so far that has mentioned a time on KZ's singleplayer campaign has said 10 hours.  You just randomly cut several hours out :-/

And on topic: Kitler is right.  Both investments, both will probably get return on their investment.

I'm really good at FPS's!

Guerrila games mentioned that its roughly 10 hours, but the short length is one of the few complaints brought up against the game.. but that doesn't matter, I'll edit it to 10 hours.. wouldn't want anyone to start to cry!

 

I'm sorry, but someone is going to have to explain to me how 10 hours is short when Nintendo Chanel stats show that the vast majority of games don't even get played that much.  Even allowing for the difference in user bases, a game that last 10 hours won't even be completed by a very significant portion of users.  This game has multiplayer on top of the campaign mode, too, so it's going to rack up a hell of a lot more than 10 hours from people that like it, while plenty of other games are shorter, lack multiplayer, and don't receive nearly as many complaints from peopel like you.  Like NG2, for example.  Methinks, perhaps, you're a bit biased?