Bodhesatva said:
He's a sissy casual imo.
On that point, I've wondered for some time why it's the "hardcore" who seem to care about graphics. I mean, we're supposed to be the elite, right? With sophisticated tastes. So why are we the ones who care about superficial things like graphics? As a similar example, special effects and CGI in movies are considered the "pulp" fanservice, and rightly so: critics are more concerned with believable characters and well told story, not with superficial issues like how cool the CGI looks, who want "epic" movies a la Spiderman or 300. In some ways, the "hardcore" make sense -- I do generally believe they're more concerned than the layman with more complex mechanics, for example. But the graphics? That baffles me. It seems much more reasonable for the masses to be concerned with graphics and "epic" games. |
Because if they were really hardcore they'd have a gaming PC?
Most PC gamers are like you, sacrifice anything to get a leg up on the competition.
I think that's because PC gamers have had multipler online a lot longer.
That and your giving the choice to scale on PC.
I'd bet if givin the choice, most competitive people would lower Killzone 2's graphical specs if it meant there shot got out of the bullet a few frames earlier... and a lot of these peoples prefrences would be quite changed.
