KylieDog said:
"Riddled with glitches" - Bias, CoD4 had plenty of glitches. WaW is hardly 'riddled' with them, has a couple.
"Inferior story" - Opinion.
"Inferior campaign" - Opinion. FACT THe AI is one of the worst i've ever seen. The enemy will stand righ in front of your team mates and shoot at you. Your team doesn't react to the enemy at all. WaW has Co-op campaign also. The co-op is mediocre at best. Compared to the co-op of R2, it flat out sucks.
"Outdated weapons" - Bias, and stupid. It is set in WW2, they will be be out of date being set over 60 years ago. The weapons are accurate to the time, but that doesn't change the fact that they suck. "Same visuals as CoD4" - Untrue, they were improved upon. True but very slightly. The difference is rarely noticable
"Laggy" - Untrue and biased since CoD4 had terrible lag when it first launched until patched. This is true however you are correct that CoC4 had problems as well.T
"Hard to join party" - Untrue. This is very true. It works about 60% of the time. Especially if you are in the multiplayer section and your friends are in the coop section.
"Stupid team selection" - Opinion. This is fact. Do you ever notice how lopsided the teams are.
"Few online trophies" - Bias, CoD4 has NONE, so WaW does this better by default. Trophies are cool but do not make a game better.
"Only decent feature zombies" - Co-op says hello. See above statement about co-op.
That fullfill your request? |
Fixed.
Dispite the previous mentioned glithes and flaws, the thing about W@W that I hate the most is the Last Stand perk. At least in Modern Warfare you can kill someone before they go to last stand.
Treyarch took a great game and ruined it. They improved nothing and made a lot of things worse!







