mesoteto on 09 February 2009
| Parokki said: Pfft, were third parties lazy last gen for ignoring the Gamecube? Porting a PC games to the 360 is easy, while the PS3 is much harder. The PS3 being the console with the lowest sales in both hardware and software means there are quite a few developers to which spending the time and effort to cope with the PS3 is simply not worth it. One of the comments was pretty good: That is the most arrogant, moronic Sony rhetoric yet. There are a lot of great indie game companies that are out there who won't even consider making their games on PS3 because of a poorly designed system, and you're going to act like that's a good thing? Some of these developers aren't even small. How about Valve? To act as if it's a good thing that Valve refused to develop for that platform because it is unnecessarily complicated and expensive to do so, is just blind fanboyism. I think the PS3 is starting to come into its own and have some great titles, but to act as if Sony's design choice hasn't hurt the system is ludicrous. |
that sums it up.....
