Yeah but PC and 360 are similar in architecture so it's easy and cheap..to make a PS3 version, they have to optimize it for the PS3's architecture, so it would take more time and money. A small studio, like the article says, can't really afford that. As a PS3 owner, I can't blame them. As a 360 and PC owner, I don't really care=P Even if I wanted the game, I could still get it.
I just think it would be wise for all of the companies complaining about the PS3 architecture to go ahead and deal with it now, because it's going to be very similar next gen..why not learn now so next gen you hit the ground running and not have problems with the architecture? Hopefully this company makes a little money and can make a port to PS3..I think it would benefit them greatly in the long run.







