For the most part, GoWII does have more detailed characters with high resolution textures. Although, when the KZ2 characters get hit with motion blur and you can't see their textures, they look extremely realistic. Btw, you posted a few E3 2005 CG screenshots there.
No, not at all. The underlying technology is great, it is just a little unconventional by today's standards. Hacking engines like this is something which people did in the NES/PS1/early PS2 days due to their low power. I've stated countless times that I think it's refreshing that Guerilla spent so much time on them to make the game look good. However, it seems that you have a problem with this. First you're unhappy with the simplification I gave so people could understand it, and now you seem unhappy with the underlying technology explanation. This question is by no means rhethorical, but are you upset over the fact that Killzone 2's graphics can be explained fairly easily? eh? I don't see why I should be upset. I appreciated your post, got your point. Ah, I apologize then, I thought you were being sarcastic in a negative way.
Jaaau! said:
jetrii said:
Jaaau! said:
So to make a long story short, KZ2 uses all kinds of artifacts to look great while the underlying tech is not as great as it may seem. Good. Thanks.
Good news Everyone!
I've invented a device which makes you read this in your head, in my voice!
