appolose said:
Guess who, Akuma? :) 2nd part: ... Yes. Inspired -> All True 1st part. We (or I) are not hostile towards science; just this particular movement amongst scientists. *Confession time* I do not think evolution is correct, and that's not just because I think it it contradicts the Bible. Now, why would I be so against the idea of God using evolution? Because, according to my understanding of Genesis, the Earth was created only 6,000 years ago, and death only arose after the fall, so you'll probably guess as to why that might cause a slight contradiction between the two. |
What precludes god from creating the heaven's and the earth with the appearence of being much older as a way to help sate the unquentiable curiosity of mankind?
And would it not ruin, or at least significantly diminish, the experience for him to tell us that's what he did?
From a strictly logical viewpoint neither evolution nor Big Bang Theory have any real bearing on the "Is there a god?" question.
@Akuma,
The timeframe of your comment regarding flat-earth is somewhat ambiguous but I want to point out for clarity that during the middle-ages flat-earth theory was not the prevailing viewpoint among cosmologist of the day. It's a common myth that christian scientists vigorously rejected the idea during this period. I'm not sure if that's what you were referring to, but I know many would take it that way because of how prevalent this myth is. edit: Oops, missed the "when Genesis was written" part.