Garnett said:
jetrii said:
Garnett said:
jetrii said:
xcot said: Difference between RE4 GC and RE4 PS2 is bigger.
/thread.
You guys said it wasn't important last gen, yet this gen you guys are zooming in on pics to see differences. |
Yes, however, the GameCube was more powerful than the Playstation 2. A Gamecube game looking better than its PS2 counterpart is not news.
Had an unbias person made this thread, we could have been discussing whether or not Cell/Blu-ray was worth it. However, now we have a worthless fanboy thread...
|
You do know the Term Xbot is a insult right?
and Cell does not do major graphics.
|
I never claimed the Cell did major graphics. However since it's harder to develop for, developers have to neglect other areas in order to properly use it and stay on budget. A lot of comapanies (Sony included) are having trouble optimizing for the PS3 so their games eat up more memory than they should and this happens.
Edit: And yes, the Cell does do major graphics in some titles to compensate for the weak GPU, but that is another discussion.
|
Not you but everyone is hoping cell can somehow make the PS3 graphics magically better.
|
Well, it can, but it's far from magic. It takes a lot of effort but the Cell can be used to help RSX render. However, then you have a fairly weak CPU and a stronger GPU... Sony should have just stuck in a normal CPU, blu-ray, and used the rest of the money on more ram+stronger GPU.
Hopefully times will changem, huh?