freedquaker said:
Well the third one is controversial. Snes was more powerful in terms of graphical capabilities but not the cpu. Its also a special case since it actually lost to Sega for the first 3 years, but Sega finally lost due to past and future mistakes, not the console itself (Sega CD, Sega 32 etc.)
There is no console which was able to win GLOBALLY without Japan and America. Its theoretically possible, but I was not "reasoning" but speaking of experience. I didnt mean OVERALL. You can still have the most sales but its not going to be a domination like NES, PS1, PS2 or Wii. All leader consoles were Japanese made and dominated Japan and America. Sega Genesis was very successful in America and Europe but couldnt stay long, why? Because they never won Japan! |
The CPU is only a component of the system, it does not decide the overall power of a console. In fact, the GPU is more much influential than the CPU.
It doesn't have to be a domination to win a console generation. Even if you're only ahead of your competition by 4M units, if you are pushing 2X the software and developers prefer your platform, it is a victory.
Good news Everyone!
I've invented a device which makes you read this in your head, in my voice!







