Rpruett said:
Maybe not. But more reviews does equate to a larger sample size, a broader based look at even more people's opinions and can provide you a much clearer picture of the general reception and opinions of a game. It certainly isn't the end all, be all. But it usually provides a solid metric or form of measurement for reviewing games.
It's still the best metric available for gathering widespread opinions about a certain game. It doesn't guarantee that you will like a game, but I would say almost any 90+ rated meta critic game you can certainly see WHY it achieved what it did (Even if you didn't enjoy it). (For example, me and GTA IV) |
Still doesn't matter. Larger sample groups do not determine which game I would like and for anyone else for that matter. You did say "opinion" which is a contradiction to a "solid metric or form of measurement for reviewing games." And if I understand your later point correctly, I will agree that gamers will acknowledge a quality game regardless of their personal preferences. But one game with more reviews from one group than another still doesn't not equate to being more accurate. Just the one with a more popular opinion.
Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.







