draik said:
They are laws that not only restrict the choice of consumer goods, but also contribute greatly both to the cost of goods and to the cost of doing business. So under "protectionism" you end up poorer, with less money for buying other things you want and need. Moreover, protectionist laws that reduce consumer spending power actually end up destroying jobs. In the USA, for example, according to the US Department of Labor's own statistics, "protectionism" destroys eight jobs in the general economy for every one saved in a protected industry. |
Yeah Im familiar with tarrif laws etc from the early days, its actually pounded into our minds by 6th grade.
You're ignoring the point that many businesses are closing their doors forever as is, because of services being outsourced, or goods gained cheaply from other nations. So, what good is a nation that is mostly unemployed because businesses in the country fail? What you're suggesting sounds like vampyrism of the American economy - you'd rather suck it dry than let it heal.
Your stat quote applies in a non-recession economy well, but not in one that has a widening pit of crisis.
Face it, the only way to save our nations is to rethink how we live, start scaling back, and brace for the impact of what might actually become a depression.







