ShadowSoldier said:
Quite Fucking True...I don't know why but apparently PS3's lineup in 2008 was lack luster :S and that statement has me confused. And thats when 360 fans bring in Sales but they didnt bring those arguments until a price drop but oh well
+1
|
I was just saying if every PS3 fanboy wants to scream about the 360's head start as their main advantage, they should also realize how awful of a headstart it was, and had they waited to launch later, or had an improved product at that head start, it could have been much worse for Sony. They also seem to want to think that the headstart was some cheating move, but I was merely pointing out that it was strategy, and a decent move to boot. You were whining, so I told you to stop. 
If 360's were pulled off the shelf for a year, you know, to even the time they've BOTH been selling.
And I never said to not count it into the argument... just merely wanted to show you that you have to see the whole situation and not just the "positives" of the headstart since there were many negatives as well.
The PS3's only "ahead of it's time" addition was the Blu-Ray. The rest was just "too much crammed into one," which is why they stripped 2 USB ports, the media card readers, back compat, etc.
Also, as a 360 owner (and a PS3 owner) I will be playing every best 3rd party game on my 360 and every best exclusive on either console. The 2009 line-up of exclusives for both systems is debatable on which is better. The 360's is better for me, especially when only 2 games of the 5 major ones on the PS3 I want are likely to make it out (Killzone 2 and Uncharted 2 will, but GT5 and GOWIII likely won't).
I've never once said the 08 line-up was lack luster, nor did I say that about the 09 line-up. To me they are about equal with the 360 pulling a slight lead with Splinter Cell, all those PC/360 exclusives I can get, etc.







