look, the media makes a big deal about killing games no matter how you do it. whether your mashing buttons or chocking a doll with the cord from the wiimote to the nunchuck, the media makes a big deal about. it will not hurt nintendo anymore than it has hurt all the killer games and consoles over the years: NOT AT ALL.
i was raised well. granted my dads a dick, but hes not the most horrible of people and has at least raised me with good morals. i love shooters, 1st person, 3rd person, war shooters, bond shooters, all types of guns, explosions, blood graphics. i can play them all the time, i love it, i love the death and realisticness of it all. its fun. i love it. guess what? the idea of actually stabbing someone or something like that makes me queazy, but in a game its sweet. i could never shoot someone, choke them, hold them under water, watch them bleed, but in a game it intriques me, i love it. but thats all it is, a game, i dont take it elswhere. the media blames this new corrupt society, filled with elder people corrupting our youth and bad parenting, on something els. its never your fault in america. it just never is. its so much easier to have a game "baby sit" your kids for you, then when they grow up and not nessesarily kill someone, just do something bad (steal, fight someone, etc) due to never getting in trouble for anything as a kid (by their parents anyway) its again easier to pin it on the video games that you once used to baby sit your kids. its stupid. and it wont hurt nintendo, this bad publicity has never hurt any gaming company ever.
if anything this will be good advertising for nintendo. think about it, here we are talking about how nintendos for babys, and not for real hardcore gamers, and then contradicting ourselves by saying nintendo M games are worse than any we have ever seen when it comes to teaching violence. if im a hard core gamer and love shooters and other closly related games, i want the corrupt console.
A delayed game is good someday, a bad game is bad forever.
Essay Pro