resident evil 5 ps3 vs. 360 comparison. 360 WINS!!!

[Gh0st4lifE]

GranTurismoHelperMax said:

NJ5 said:

Gh0st4lifE said:
it's 2009 and despite a 5 gig install the PS3 still suffers from the inferior version syndrome




I'm sorry but that's really not what a high end console is supposed to offer. Blu-ray was a huuuuuuge mistake.

I would wait for the final version before making such claims. It might also not have anything to do with Blu-Ray (except for the install part). Maybe the 360 version uses more than 256 MB for graphical memory which you can't do on the PS3 AFAIK.

 

 

Well, for the most part, yes, the PS3 suffers from less graphic memory and RAM, but it does have a faster "Cell" processor. But I do think the isntall times dont actually benefit the PS3, it just reduces loading times due to the slow blu-ray reading times since its only 2X for the PS3's blu-ray vs 12X for the 360's DVD. So yea, big difference. The PS3 does look like it has better lighting effects (ss of guy holding microphone has light reflecting over glasses), but 360 has better textures due to more grphics memory.

 

I don't blame the blu-ray for technical reasons alone but mainly because of costs. Although the loading times are already a burden of their own, its' the bottleneck that really worries me. Getting the Cell to exhibit some power despite the GPU takes a lot of programming hence a lot of money. Had Sony planed a DVD based console they could have added a much needed better GPU, period.