By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hawk said:
W29 said:
FishyJoe said:
Anybody who thinks that the Wiimote is just about waving your arms around hasn't played many Wii games, especially MP3.

I played the Wii for 3 days straight, I played Wii Sports (lackluster length got tried of it quite quickly especially if your by yourself. Resident Evil 4 Wii Edition. Only has an new aiming device, which I did enjoy by the way than the PS2 regular screen. But I didn't say that the Wii is trash, I just said its not a primary system I see it being a secondary system something I would play if I got tired of the 360. My interest level on the system when I was over my cousin house was low. I played it for 2 hours and than said I feel like playing Madden 08 and Gears of War or Motorstorm. Its weird, Wii is a gimmick.


If you don't like the whole control experience of the Wii remote, hey cool, I seriously won't argue your preference. But dallas saying it won't work for RPG's is very wrong. The controls are all there, and a plethora of people out there like the Wii remote and some even dfind it the superior control scheme. RPG would work just fine for a large amount of people out there, and maybe even better. His whole menu arguement just does not makes sense.


You see I don't have a problem with the Wii, I am just saying its not a good primary system at all. Its a secondary. You should have a Xbox 360 or PS3 and then the Wii. The Wii is good to have but I would like to have a true next-gen experience like what the 360 is doing for me. I'm thinking of a purchase for the Wii. Since really the Wii is not in any battle against the 360. I would like to make a combo of the Wii60. But my argument here is like I said above. I don't understand how can people solely just play the Wii and not the 360 or PS3. Shouldn't the gamer have both?