By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
terislb on 02 February 2009
Edit Thread
windbane said:
Garnett said:
windbane said:
Garnett said:
windbane said:
Garnett said:
windbane said:
 

Why, for agreeing with you at the end? You think people only like graphics because it's a popular franchise. I guess it's the same for all the publications that voted it the best graphics of 2008. What's the point of arguing with you when you are basically saying "what everyone thinks about the game is wrong"? To that, I say "not really." I happen to agree with what I think. but hey, thanks for the report.

Oh so NOW you wanna talk eh,you didnt agree with me you kept saying "not really"

And actually Gears 1 won best graphics in 07 so i guess they all were right to? So Gears 1 = best graphics ever? Thats your logic.

Talking to you is a waste of time because that makes no sense. Report me again. I'm sure a mod would get a good laugh out of that quote.

You said "What everyone thinks about the game is wrong" (Saying that MGS4 has great graphics and everyone agrees with it cause it won a FEW Graphic awards)

I said "And actually Gears 1 wont best graphics in 07 so i guess they were all right to? So Gears 1 = best graphics ever?" (Meaning that Graphic awards mean squat cause there handed out every year and a game cannot win the award twice.

Is that easy enough for you to understand? ? ? ?

Well, considering you said the exact same thing, this is my response as to whether what you are saying is making any sense: not really. Is english your first language (serious question)?

Why the hell did you say "Not really" all the times if you were agreeing with me? and im done cause your not staying on subject.

You're the one that branched down this path of the original topic. I'll have to play single player before I know if KZ2 is better than MGS4 in graphics.

Let's summarize: you said that MGS4 doesn't have awesome graphics like people think. If people think that, who are you to tell them they are wrong? So I say: not really. You say: care to elaborate? I say: not really, because you are saying what I think is wrong from the get go. You say: then you have no argument. I say: not really, because whatever I say you are just going to say I don't think correctly, so what argument can I have? (hence I agreed with you, saying I don't really have an argument)

Now, that said...what you followed with makes absolutely no sense. I said MGS4 won many awards for it's graphics, meaning it's not just gamers on this site that you are saying think incorrectly. You say, the previous year, that Gears of War won graphics awards and must be the best looking game ever? What? How did my logic lead to that, as you claim? Even if Gears was the best in 2007, which it couldn't have been because it came out in 2006 (as Kantor alludes to above), then how does that stop MGS4 from looking good in 2008?

 

thank to you for the last 3 pages this thread has been a waste of time for the rest of us.. are you done feeding your egos on a argument that has no point and no end ? thats exactly what i was talking about when i said that those threads  devolve into a flame war most of the time... do you feel better now... did this give you something?