The wii's controller is revolutionary, but so is xbox live. Stof mentioned the Dreamcast's online capabilties, but the system wasn't nearly as well evolved as xbox live. To say that the xbox live revolution is not significant to gaming is silly. The online capabilities of the Xbox 360 (lol, even the first xbox) still far exceed the capabilities of the PS3 or the Wii. Certainly the Wii is making a significant step for console gaming, but just like online, Nintendo was not the first company to envision motion-controlled gaming. I think Molyneux is wrong to say that xbox live is a bigger revolution that the Wii's motion control, however they are both extremely significant and receiving high adoption rates accordingly (even though xbox live costs money).
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
