By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
windbane on 31 January 2009
Edit Thread
NJ5 said:
Khuutra said:
windbane said:

No, he's saying that the controls do not suffer from having to use analog sticks.

The best control for FPS on any console right now is UT3 on PS3 only, and yet I somehow find a way to enjoy Wii and PS3 games that don't use keyboard and mouse.

I actually prefer analog now because I'm used to it. I don't think the Wii IR is accurate enough.

Howso?

He wants to be able to shoot every single cell of the enemies' bodies. Pixel accuracy is for casuals :P

 

Heh, no, I just feel like I have more control with the analog. I haven't played CoD5 but I hear the controls are similar or worse than MoH:H2 which I did play. I also played MP3. It's not bad, I just think it needs a little tweaking.

Also, when playing RE:UC, I wished so much for a real light gun rather than relative aiming. A mouse and analog stick is also relative, but it would be nice to be able to aim directly at where you want to shoot instead of just guiding the IR like a mouse or analog. When compared to analog and mouse, it uses the same principle of having to guide your pointer (or screen) relative to where you are currently, and I just don't feel like it's more accurate than analog and not close to a mouse yet.

Edit:  And it's certainly not enough to trash a game because it's not on Wii.  If RE5 was on Wii, I'd still get the PS3 version.