Hablemos en Español

[BoleroOfFire]

Flow said:

BoleroOfFire said:
Sure, ignore the conjunction that's MIA while clearly present in the Australia bit about spiders. Common sense would tell you to read something as it's written, not as you'd like it to be. The statement about wild minors came directly after the praising of wild women without any kind of coordinating conjunction to separate the topics or indicate a change of mood. It even ends in a very excited tone punctuated with exclamation marks. As you admitted yourself, he isn't condemning them. Yet, in his "clean up of the misunderstanding" as you put it, he claims to have done exactly that. Lastly, having a daughter doesn't mean anything. Unless you're insinuating that men with daughters never take advantage of women.

He isn't comdemning nor praising in his original statement, which opened it for interpretation until he cleared up what he meant

I don't know why i'm still on it, since it's a fact you can understand what he wrote the way i understood, because if it wasn't i wouldn't have did that, and i'm not lying to you, and i said enough to back up this fact

You're saying he does neither yet when he "clears up what he meant" he claimed to have been criticizing the girls.

Interesting.  So I have to understand what he wrote the way you did?  I didn't.  I can also claim it's a fact that you can interpret what he said that same as I did.  

I'm done arguing with someone who skirts around valid points and thinks their opinion is fact.