By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
nightsurge said:
Rpruett said:
Squilliam said:
Rpruett said:
Squilliam said:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-780g-chipset,1785-11.html

See? Even one of the "best" IGPs is outmatched by some very basic strategy games. Btw, you cannot run these games effectively at a low resolution because you simply cannot see a wide enough scale to perform effectively.

 

You're right....If your resolution is set at 1280x1024.   Do you understand that by dropping your resolution you will see a drastic increase in terms of performance?  This is the second time you've posted something that really is not relevant in any way.

Do you have a strategy game on your computer? Try playing it at the lowest resolution and see how "easy" it is. This isn't a FPS where you could get away with a lot more.

Furthermore most IGPs out there would flat-out not run these games, the Intel kind which makes up the majority of the market. Its like scaling a game to run on the PS1 and PS3+, which is incredibly difficult to accomplish.

 

Is playing a strategy game on your computer at 800x600 or 640x480.....Much different than playing an Xbox 360 game on an SDTV? Since resolution is of utmost importance?

 

 

 

That's why many RTS games don't work on a console as apposed to a PC, so yes, resolution in an RTS is very important.

You're correct.  But then again, why was the point brought up in the first place then?  Pointless.